Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Henderson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1978No. 57115PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order in a habeas corpus proceeding where a reduction of bail pending appeal was sought.

The dissent would hold that Article 44.34, V.A.C.C.P., requires that a transcription of the court reporter’s notes must be made a part of the record even though it is not requested by an appellant.1

Article 44.34 provides:

“When the defendant appeals from the judgment rendered on the hearing of an application under habeas corpus, a record of the proceedings in the cause shall be made out and certified to, together with all the testimony offered, and shall be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte NaillCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Ex parte SimsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Ex Parte KindellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Ex Parte Ray PalmerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Ex parte MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Ex Parte David Sidney McKeand, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  3. Bradley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Bradley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Ex Parte David Sidney McKeand, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API