Legal Opinion

Proehl v. Kirsch

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1932No. File No. 7426PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM,

This is a workmen’s compensation case now before us on motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal to this court for the reason that the judgment of the circuit court attempted to be appealed from was entered without jurisdiction; appeal having been taken to the circuit court directly from a decision of the industrial commissioner sitting in lieu of a board of arbitration without application for a review hearing before the industrial commissioner. This position is well taken, as recently established by this court in Murray v. Stokke, 60 S. D. 224, 244 N. W. 265. However, instead of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murray v. StokkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Chizek v. StainocherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Ackerman v. WinterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bahlkow v. PrestonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Peterson v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API