Legal Opinion

Young v. Tennessee River Pulp and Paper Co.

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided August 6, 1986No. WC 86-11-LS-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SENTER, Chief Judge.

The wife and son of the decedent brought this diversity action for damages for the death of their husband and father, which was the result of a car-truck collision. Plaintiffs claim negligence by defendant. Defendant denies liability on the grounds that the truck which was involved in the collision was owned by, and the driver thereof was an employee of, an independent contractor. On that basis, defendant has moved for summary judgment in its favor. 1

I. FACTS.

Defendant Tennessee River Pulp and Paper Company (Tennessee River) is engaged in, among other…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Kisner v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Carr v. CRABTREEMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. CreekmoreMississippi Supreme Court · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKee v. BrimmerDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1994
  2. Young v. Tennessee River PulpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API