Legal Opinion

Ryan v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 9, 2000No. 97-10867-DPW, 97-10868-DPW, 97-10969-JLTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TAURO and WOODLOCK, District Judges.

Pro se Petitioner John Ryan brings these habeas corpus actions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate concurrent criminal sentences. He is presently serving a 210 month prison term for bank robbery, kidnapping and firearm possession offenses, to which he pled guilty in 1992. In his § 2255 motions, Petitioner attacks these sentences, arguing that we separately adopted an incorrect sentencing guideline range recommendation from the probation department’s presentence report (“PSR”).

I. BACKGROUND

Between October 16, 1990 and April 17, 1991, Petitioner,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinezDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Nolan v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API