Legal Opinion

Owens v. Harnett Transfer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 1979No. 7811DC828PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s denial of its motion for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Defendant contends that the evidence shows as a matter of law that plaintiff breached the contract by ceasing to drive the tractor after 18 October 1976 and by allowing the payments on the tractor to become two months in arrears, thus establishing defendant’s right to repossess the vehicle on 6 February 1977 pursuant to the terms of the contract. We do not agree.

First we note that the transaction that is the subject of this action was a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Guerry v. American Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Melton v. CrottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Rape v. LyerlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Saunders v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federal Express Corporation v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. Foy v. SpinksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Clifford v. River Bend Plantation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Deep Run Milling Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Foy v. SpinksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API