Legal Opinion · Dissent

Haliw v. City of Sterling Heights

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 2001No. 115686, Calendar No. 10Published

1DissentKelly, J.

I believe that plaintiffs established questions of fact about whether (1) the claimed depression in the sidewalk rendered the sidewalk no longer reasonably safe, (2) the ice or snow on which Valeria Haliw fell was a “natural accumulation,” and *313(3) her injuries were proximately caused by the sidewalk’s condition.

The majority’s resolution of these factual disputes is an impermissible invasion into the province of the finder of fact. Because the issues should be left for the finder of fact, I would affirm the Court of Appeals decision that upheld the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Miller v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API