Legal Opinion
Office Supply Co., Inc. v. Basic/Four Corp.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 3, 1982No. Civ. A. 80-C-603PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.
This is an action for damages brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The plaintiff Office Supply Co., Inc. (“Office Supply”) is a corporation located in Racine, Wisconsin, which sells office supplies. The defendant Basic/Four Corporation (“Basic/Four”) is a California corporation which manufactures and sells computer hardware and software. In 1975, Office Supply purchased computer hardware and leased computer software from Basic/Four. Office Supply claims that the system was defective and caused it to suffer substantial losses. It seeks compensation for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- S. M. Wilson & Company v. Smith International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,472 Frank A. Beard and Edith F. Beard v. J.I. Case Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Tenneco, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Shearer v. Homestake Mining Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1983
- Jaskey Finance and Leasing v. Display Data Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Helland v. Kurtis A. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.