Legal Opinion

Kidd v. Lance

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 8, 1990No. 3-90-047-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, Justice.

This mandamus action arises out of a hotly contested personal injury action. The district court concluded that the attorney for the hospital intentionally disregarded an order granting a motion in limine, and after the jury had returned its verdict, granted the plaintiffs’ motion for mistrial and imposed substantial sanctions against the attorney and the hospital.

We find that the district court failed to accord the attorney the due process protections provided in section 21.002 of the Texas Government Code, and that the sanctions imposed exceed the trial court’s authority.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wagner v. WarnaschTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bristol-Myers Co. v. GonzalesTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Deramus v. ThorntonTexas Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Texas Association of Business and William O. Hammond v. Ronald Earle, District Attorney, Travis County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Rosser v. SquierTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Onstad v. Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  4. McCoy v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Albert Acevedo, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API