Legal Opinion

Stauffer Reducing, Inc. v. Cummins

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1962No. 36381PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice House

The Director of Labor determined that the appellant was the employer of certain field representatives under the Unemployment Compensation Act and the circuit court of Cook County affirmed this determination. Appellant seeks a further review of the determination by this court.

Appellant is a distributor of the “Stauffer Home Plan” and “Posture-Rest” apparatus, a unit used to aid in weight reduction. It utilizes the services of field representatives, who contact prospective customers and secure orders for the cash sale, conditional time sale or leasing of the weight-reducing machines. Their sole…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. DaumitIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ross v. CumminsIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Myers v. Cummins, Director of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Bargain Busters, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  2. Bennett v. Department of Employment SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Hart v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Spahn v. Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Department of LaborAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API