Legal Opinion · Concurrence

A.J.H.T. v. K.O.H.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 27, 2007No. 2051035Published

1ConcurrenceBryan, Judge

I concur in the main opinion. I write to express additional reasons why the juvenile court’s judgment should be affirmed.

This court, as well as our supreme court, has repeatedly stated that the paramount concern in termination proceedings is the best interest of the child. See Ex parte J.R., 896 So.2d 416, 423 (Ala.2004); A.A. v. Cleburne County Dep’t of Human Res., 912 So.2d 261, 264 (Ala.Civ.App.2005); and V.O. v. State Dep’t of Human Res., 876 So.2d 1151, 1153 (Ala.Civ.App.2003). Furthermore, our legislature has unequivocally stated:

“It is the purpose of this chapter [the 1984 Child…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. T.V. v. B.S.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Matter of MooreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. J.R. v. State Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. A.A. v. Cleburne County DhrCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API