Harris v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Chief Justice.
Appellant Harris appeared pro se at his jury trial and on January 19, 1981 was convicted of obtaining. property by false pretenses under § 6-3-106, W.S.1977. Mr. Harris takes this appeal from the judgment and sentence entered on the jury’s verdict and raises the following issues for review:
1. Is the judgment and sentence of the trial court void for failure of the verdict to comply with § 7-11-502, W.S.1977?
2. Did the prosecutor’s comments in closing argument amount to a denial of appellant’s right to a fair trial?
We will reverse and remand for a new trial under appellant’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hampton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Hayes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Hatheway v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. ChambersWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
- Thomson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Westmark v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Connor v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- Connor v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- Westmark v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984