Legal Opinion

Habersham v. Sears

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Lord, J.:

This was an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, as sheriff of Multnomah county, to levy a writ of execution and to make due return thereof, based substantially upon this state of facts: That on the 22nd • day of April, 1884, the petitioner duly recovered a judg*432ment against S. Herman in an action in the circuit court of Oregon for Columbia county, for one hundred _ dollars damages, and costs and disbursements taxed at (about) sixty-five dollars, and for the possession of certain saw-logs; that said judgment was duly rendered and entered in said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McClellan v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
  2. Miller v. State, ex rel. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Warner v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Duggan v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Pierce v. SlusherOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Coos Bay Railroad v. WiederOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Johnson v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State Ex Rel. United Railways Co. v. EkwallOregon Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API