United States v. Nicholas Padilla
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge.
Nicholas Padilla appeals his jury conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Padilla argues that his motion for new trial should have been granted because, after his conviction, a state court invalidated his predicate state conviction nunc pro tunc. Padilla also challenges the district court’s admission of a statement obtained from him allegedly in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Finally, Padilla contends that the district court erred in admitting expert testimony…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Tashiri Wayne WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- People v. McFaddenIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
- In re N.G.Illinois Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.