Legal Opinion

Baker v. Prolerized Chicago Corporation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 21, 1971No. 71 C 301PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILL, District Judge.

The trustees of the bankrupt Penn Central Transportation Company (hereinafter “Penn Central”) bring this action seeking to recover charges for alleged interior switching or intraplant switching performed by the railroad at defendant Prolerized’s request at Prolerized’s plant in Chicago between February 7, 1970, and August 18, 1970. Penn Central, being a common carrier railroad subject to the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., seeks to recover on the basis of its Freight Tariff 40105, issued December 4, 1968, effective…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. C. H. Albers Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Davis v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. United States v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Empire Box Corp. of Stroudsburg v. Delaware, L. & W. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. Southeastern Michigan Shippers Co-Operative Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1973
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. City of PensacolaDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1995
  3. Union Barge Line Corp. v. United Rental Equipment Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API