Legal Opinion

Moore v. Cason Bros.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 6, 1949No. 33511PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

Plaintiff, a copartnership composed by Claude Cason, Frank Ca-son and Ed Cason, sought to recover the balance due on two promissory notes executed to the partnership by the defendant, Burl Moore. Defendant admitted the execution of the notes and entered the affirmative plea of payment and the statute of limitations. On a trial to a jury verdict was rendered for $150.23, the balance alleged to be due on both notes. Judgment was rendered thereon, and defendant appeals.

Both notes were executed April 23, 1937. One was for the principal sum of $139, the second for $150. Claude Cason testified that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gillett v. RomigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  2. Lusk v. BandySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. McCoy v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. McNary v. Farmers' Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Burton v. HarnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. NighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. R & S AUTO SERVICE v. McGillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API