Legal Opinion
O'Connell Gold Mines, Ltd. v. Baker
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 1944No. Civ. 6886PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The appellants contend that because plaintiff had surrendered its right to “transact intrastate business in this State” (sec. 405, Civ. Code) and failed to perform “assessment work” upon the mining property for the years 1936-1937 (sec. 1426, Civ. Code, now sec. 2314, Pub. Res. Code), the claims and title thereto were forfeited.
The defendants have appealed from a judgment quieting title in the plaintiff, 0 ’Connell Gold Mines, Ltd., to quartz mining claims situated in Siskiyou County. The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Washington.
The plaintiff is a foreign…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gen. Conference of Free Baptists v. BerkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Indian Ref. Co., Inc. v. Royal Oil Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Callahan v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Chapman v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Davies v. Mt. Gaines Mining & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- United Medical Management Ltd. v. GattoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Lewis v. LeBaronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967