Legal Opinion

Reinagel v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 11, 2013No. 12-50569PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

In this case, mortgagors who defaulted on their note seek to enjoin a bank from foreclosing, contending that the assignments by which the bank obtained the note and corresponding deed of trust were “robo-signed” and therefore invalid. The district court granted the bank’s motion to dismiss. We affirm.

I

In February 2004, Dia and Joseph Reinagel, the appellants, purchased a property in Helotes, Texas for $307,840, obtaining the necessary financing from a mortgage lender not party to this appeal. In May 2006, the Reinagels refinanced, obtaining a $360,000…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nobles v. MarcusTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. South Texas Water Authority v. LomasTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Basic Capital Management, Inc. v. Dynex Commercial, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In Re WalkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Kevin Murphy v. Aurora Loan ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Reinagel v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  3. DTND Sierra Investments LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2013
  4. Stephan Epstein v. U.S. Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  5. Svoboda v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API