Legal Opinion

In re Hoey

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 2, 1923No. 207PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

Hoey, Tilden & Co., a partnership consisting of Matthew J. Hoey and Edward Tilden, were petitioned in bankruptcy on August 15, 1922. On August 16, 1922, the petitioner obtained a temporary injunction from the Supreme Court of the state of New York restraining the bankrupt and the New York Stock Exchange from transferring the proceeds of a sale of a membership seat formerly held and owned by Hoey and sold by him some days prior to the date of the filing of the "petition. In the action in the state court it was alleged that the petitioner’s assignor, one Trygve Barth, a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Murphy v. John Hofman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Whitney v. WenmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Lazarus, Michel & Lazarus v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Board of Trade of Chicago v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Smith v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Moore v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  4. In Re WorrallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  5. First Trust Co. v. BaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API