Legal Opinion
Marriage of Elliott v. Elliott
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 7, 1994No. 67A01-9307-CV-222PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
Again we must confront the issue of pauper petitions in civil appeals to decide what evidence is necessary to establish indigency. Appellant-petitioner Joe Elliott argues that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his pauper petition to proceed on appeal. He also claims the trial court erroneously ordered him to pay child support in excess of the Ind.Child Support Guidelines.
FACTS
On December 6, 1991, the trial court dissolved Joe and Patricia Elliott's marriage incorporating their settlement agreement. Patricia was awarded custody of their daughter, Betty, and Joe…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc., Dba Sears Real Estate and Charles W. Sears, Appeal of Charles W. SearsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Campbell v. Criterion GroupIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Hendryx v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Moore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Meeker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marriage of Bojrab v. BojrabIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Trabucco v. TrabuccoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Abouhalkah v. SharpsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Carter v. HicksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Abouhalkah v. SharpsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.