Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gibbs v. Blount County Beer Board

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1984Published

1DissentBrock, Justice

Respectfully, I dissent from the majority opinion. The record indicates that the applicant for the beer permit in this case has complied with every provision of T.C.A., § 57-5-105, which controls the issuance of beer permits. In such a case we have held over and over in recent years that the permit should be granted. Harvey v. Rhea County Beer Bd., Tenn., 563 S.W.2d 790 (1978); Lones v. Blount County Beer Bd., *70Tenn., 538 S.W.2d 386 (1976); Coffman v. Hammer, Tenn., 548 S.W.2d 310 (1977); City of Memphis, Etc. v. Randall Mem., Etc., Tenn., 550 S.W.2d 657 (1977); McCarter v. Goddard, Tenn., 609…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lones v. Blount County Beer BoardTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Coffman v. HammerTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Harvey v. Rhea County Beer BoardTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Memphis Alcohol Commission v. Randall Memorial Free Will Baptist Church, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. McCarter v. GoddardTennessee Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API