Commonwealth v. Perkins
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Court being equally divided the judgment of sentence remains in effect.
O’BRIEN, J., files an opinion in support of affirmance which is joined by EAGEN, C. J., and LARSEN, J. ROBERTS, J., files an opinion in support of reversal in which NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., join. POMEROY, former J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE
O’BRIEN, Justice.
Appellant, Michael Perkins, was tried by a judge sitting with a jury and was convicted of murder of the third degree. Post-verdict motions were denied and appellant was sentenced to serve a…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ruger v. DaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. PETROSKYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth v. DanzySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
4Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. MinnisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. BadmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. PottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. MichuckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.