Legal Opinion
Carlisle Trust Co. v. Patrons' Mutual Fire Ins.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County
Decided March 13, 1935No. 256Published
1Opinion of the Court
Reese, P. J.,
The pleadings disclose substantially the following facts. The defendant company insured the barns on two farms of the plaintiff against fire. Attached by rider to each policy was the following clause:
“This policy shall also cover any direct loss or damage to the property insured by it, caused by lightning, tornado or cyclone, not exceeding the sum so insured, *290nor the interest of the insured in the property, and subject in all other respects to the terms and conditions of this policy. Provided, however, if there shall be any other insurance on said property, this company shall be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Urian v. Scranton Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- MacDonald v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Skelly v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- West v. MacMillan (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Sloat v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.