Legal Opinion

James v. Riddle

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 18, 1983No. Civ. 3604PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

This is an unemployment compensation case.

After claimant, Herman Riddle, was discharged from Southern Metals Company, he applied for unemployment compensation but was denied benefits by the Department of Industrial Relations (Department). Claimant appealed the Department’s decision to circuit court where trial was held de novo. After a hearing ore tenus, the trial court awarded stipulated benefits to claimant. The Department appeals.

The Department at the completion of claimant’s evidence moved for a directed verdict.1 The motion was denied. The Department contends…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deptartment of Industrial Relations v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Davis v. McBroomCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Davis v. NullCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davenport v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONSCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Carlisle v. Director, Department of Industrial RelationsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Canady v. AllenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API