Legal Opinion

Padilla v. Mason

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1931No. 2938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Ducker, J.:

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal, to strike the transcript on appeal, and for other relief. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff obtained an interlocutory decree of partition on default in the lower court, from which defendant appealed. Her appeal was dismissed by this court. Padilla v. Mason, 53 Nev. 226, 296 P. 1083. The present appeal was taken by defendant from an order denying her motion to set aside said decree of partition. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss and strike is based on a number of grounds, among which are the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Water Co. v. Belmont Dev. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Padilla v. MasonNevada Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Irvin v. PetitfilsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Smith v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Smith v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API