Legal Opinion

Sobieski v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1927No. Nos. 17798, 17799, 17800, 17801. Writs dismissedPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

Peter J. Sobieski, as guardian of Walter Sobieski and of John Sobieski, Katherna Grossman and Viola Pauley each obtained a judgment against the city of Chicago, and upon failure of the city to pay the judgments on demand each filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. Demurrers were filed to these petitions and sustained. Leave was given to amend the petitions but the amendment was not made. In each case the parties assumed that the amendment had been made and proceeded accordingly. The circuit court entered its judgment awarding the writ in each case, and the city appealed to the Appellate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wingert v. First Nat. Bank of HagerstownSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Wick v. Chicago Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Matter of Croker v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1903

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Massell v. DaleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Tuttle v. GundersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Elgin National Watch Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  4. Elgin Nat'l Watch Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  5. First National Bank v. Road District No. 8Appellate Court of Illinois · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API