Hughes v. Felton
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Superior Court of Denver.
1Opinion of the Court
De France, C.
Felton was plaintiff in the court below, and obtained a judgment by default against Hughes, the defendant. Hughes afterwards moved for a vacation of said judgment, but his motion was denied. The denial of said motion is assigned for error. It is not permissible, in a case brought here by writ of error, to assign error on an order of court made after final judgment. Polk v. Butterfield, 9 Colo. 325.
The only other point relied upon for a reversal is that the superior court is no court, and had no jurisdiction as such to pass judgment in the case. To support this proposition it is…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- The People v. . the Supervisors of ChenangoNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Polk v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
3Cited by13 opinions
- Meyer v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- In re Interrogatories of the GovernorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Schmidt v. DreyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Territory of Hawaii v. TamHawaii Supreme Court · 1942
- Miller v. BuyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.