Commonwealth v. Martz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
POPOVICH, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant Derek Martz appeals the judgment of sentence for corruption of minors and indecent assault on grounds that: 1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss pursuant to Pa. R.Crim.P. 600; 2) the trial court erred in determining that he is a sexually violent predator (“SVP”); 3) the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction; and 4) the convictions should merge for sentencing purposes. We affirm in part and vacate in part.
¶ 2 In evaluating Rule 600 issues, our standard of review of a trial court’s decision is whether the trial court abused…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. BerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. HuntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ManleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. SpringerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. McBrideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. StilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. QuintuaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.