Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Martz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 2007PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

POPOVICH, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant Derek Martz appeals the judgment of sentence for corruption of minors and indecent assault on grounds that: 1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss pursuant to Pa. R.Crim.P. 600; 2) the trial court erred in determining that he is a sexually violent predator (“SVP”); 3) the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction; and 4) the convictions should merge for sentencing purposes. We affirm in part and vacate in part.

¶ 2 In evaluating Rule 600 issues, our standard of review of a trial court’s decision is whether the trial court abused…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. BerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. HuntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ManleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. SpringerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. McBrideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. StilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. QuintuaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API