Legal Opinion

Baker v. Butte City Water Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1900No. 1,503PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mr. Justice Hunt dissenting. Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; John Lindsay, Judge. Action by Ben Baker against the Butte City Water Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Per curiam

— Motion to dismiss appeals on the ground, among others, of insufficiency of the undertaking. There are two appeals: one from a final judgment, and another from an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial. The undertaking is in the sum of $300. It is conditioned as follows: “The condition of this obligation is such that, whereas, on the 31st day of July, 1899, in the above-entitled court and cause, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant; and whereas, on the llth day of November, 1899, an order was made by said court denying defendant’s motion for a new…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vane v. TowleIdaho Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pirrie v. MouleMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Baker v. Second Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Baker v. Butte City Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Coleman v. PerryMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Frary v. DwyerMontana Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API