Legal Opinion

Hickman Bank & Trust Co. v. Pickard

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 10, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirming.

Appellee, May-berry, became surety for one Jones on two notes, totalling $10,100.00, to appellant Bank & Trust Company, on May 30, 1922, and upon Jones’ fail*774ing to pay the notes this suit was commenced by the bank against Mayberry for a recovery on the two notes and for a cancellation of two deeds made by appellee, Mayberry, to appellee, Pickard, for land and personal property located in Hikman county, as fraudulent, and the subjection of the land to the payment of the bank’s debt, with interest and costs, under section 1906, Kentucky Statutes.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Interstate Petroleum Co. v. FarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Winfrey's Trustee v. WinfreyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Adams Express Co. v. Burr Oak Jersey FarmCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. S. Rose Co. v. HasenzahlCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Security Bank v. Zimlich'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  2. Wyan v. Raisin Monumental CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Farmers' and Merchants' Bank v. BlueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Isaac's Administratix v. HigniteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Citizens Nat. Bank of Bowling Green v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API