Legal Opinion

S. Rose Co. v. Hasenzahl

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 20, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Bogers Clay, Commissioner

Beversing.

Appellant, The S. Bose Company, a corporation, is engaged in the State of New York in the business of importing, buying and selling rough diamonds, carbon and bort, etc., for use for mechanical and scientific purposes. On March 7, 1908, it sold and delivered to appellee, William Hasenzahl, to be paid for in thirty days from said date, six stones of drill bort, weighing 7 7-32 carats, at $6.00 per carat, and five stones of carbon, weighing 5 1-2 carats, at $40.00 per carat, making a total of $263.31. Appellee declined to pay for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marksbury v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Penick v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Hickman Bank & Trust Co. v. PickardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  3. Hurst v. DuffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Whitaker v. Davidson, AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API