Legal Opinion

Bowens v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1991No. S019774PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

In this case we resolve the issue of whether, in light of the June 5, 1990, adoption of an initiative measure designated on the ballot as Proposition 115 and identified as the “Crime Victims Justice Reform Act,” an indicted defendant is entitled to or may receive a postindictment preliminary hearing in the courts of this state. (See also Whitman v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 1063 [2 Cal.Rptr.2d, 160, 820 P.2d 262] [challenge to facial constitutionality of Prop. 115 provisions permitting hearsay testimony at preliminary hearings]; Izazaga v. Superior Court (1991) 54…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. AyalaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. AyalaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Leone v. Medical Bd. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API