Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Dalziel

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1902No. S.F. No. 2644PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

Action for money had and received. A demurrer to plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint was sustained, without leave to amend, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment thereupon entered against him.

The money sought to be recovered by plaintiff in this action is alleged to have been fraudulently received by the defendant on or about February 20, 1893, and the fact that it was received by the defendant was not discovered until December 1, 1899. This action was commenced March 31, 1900. The amount claimed is $1,036.34, with interest from February 20, 1893.

Two grounds of demurrer are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Cole v. McGlathrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1832

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Scafidi v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Phelps v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Adams v. AlbanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API