Steiger v. Brown
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Warner
¶1 Terry L. Steiger and Tammy Steiger (Steigers) appeal the Order of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, holding that Mary R. Brown (Brown) had a prescriptive easement to use and maintain portions of a driveway and a garage which encroaches on their property, and denying them attorney fees and certain costs. We affirm.
¶2 We restate and address the issues on appeal as follows:
¶3 1. Did the District Court err by holding that Brown’s predecessors in interest had established a prescriptive easement to access and maintain the garage that encroaches onto Steigers’ property?
¶4 2.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Public Lands Access Ass'n v. Boone & Crockett Club Foundation, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
- Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. GlausMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Ray v. NanselMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Guthrie v. HardyMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- Lemont Land Corp. v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pedersen Trust v. ZiehlMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Wills Cattle Co. v. ShawMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Ashby v. MAECHLINGMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Jacobson v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2016
- Eldredge v. Asarco Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.