Legal Opinion

People v. Howell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 23, 1978No. 28072PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carrigan

This appeal arises from a speical proceeding before a Pueblo district court jury which determined that the appellant Howell was not eligible for release from commitment to the Colorado State Hospital. Sections 16-8-115 and 16-8-120, C.R.S. 1973. Appellant here claims that the statutory standard governing eligibility for conditional release, 1 as applied to him, violated his right to due process of law. We do not agree.

Appellant was first committed to the Colorado State Hospital on March 11, 1971. That commitment resulted from a finding that he was not guilty by reason of insanity after he had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lessard v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
  2. State v. KrolSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. In Re FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. United States v. Lewis C. Ecker, IICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  5. Doremus v. FarrellDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Mental RetardationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. People v. ChavezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. People v. FettySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. James Edward Glatz v. Dr. Haydee Kort, Hugh Jan Cornell v. Dr. Frank TraylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  5. People v. StevensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API