Legal Opinion

United States v. Lorenzo D. Farley (92-3538) Robert J. White (92-3539) and Charles B. Jones (92-3541)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 29, 1993No. 92-3538, 92-3539 and 92-3541PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Lorenzo D. Farley, Robert J. White, and Charles B. Jones, appeal their jury convictions for extortion under color of official right, in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and for conspiracy to commit extortion in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1951. On appeal, defendants claim (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict, and (2) the government’s prosecuto-rial misconduct deprived them of their right to a fair trial. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

I

The conspiracy upon which defendants’ convictions are based involved the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. BockDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  2. United States v. Richard CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Darryl M. Durr v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. David Devon DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Ernest Glenn Pierce, Sr. (94-5841) and Brian Grayson Tackett (94-6234)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API