Legal Opinion
Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest Service
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 6, 2002No. CIV.01-703-HAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HAGGERTY, District Judge.
Plaintiff and defendants have moved for summary judgment. Oral argument on these motions was heard on July 1, 2002. For the following reasons, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff challenges a Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (“DN/FONSI”) the Forest Service issued on June 26, 2000, implementing plans to control the spread of — and eradicate — noxious weeds on a portion of the Malheur National Forest. The Decision reviews defendants’…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Blaine P. Thompson v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
- W. Watersheds Project v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Oregon Natural Resources Council Action v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2006
- W. Watersheds Project v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.