Dogge v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Pound, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
The plaintiff in error was convicted of practicing medicine in Lancaster county without first having complied *141with the act “to regulate the practice of medicine in the state of Nebraska,” approved March 3d, 1881 (Laws of 1881, pages 282—286). The testimony shows that he is a graduate of one or more medical colleges, and that he has practiced medicine for about eighteen years before removing to this state. He therefore claims that the provisions of the act do not apply to him.
Sec. 1 of the act above referred to declares that “it shall be unlawful for any person to practice medicine, surgery,…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- State ex rel. Burroughs v. WebsterIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- State ex rel. Selden v. BerkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Steele County v. ErskineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- O'Connor v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.