Corning Glass Works v. Southern New England Telephone Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
TELESCA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Corning Glass Works (“Coming”) commenced this action seeking a declaratory judgment that defendant Southern New England Telephone Company (“SNET”) is not sublicensed to use certain of Coming’s patents relating to the manufacture of optical waveguide fiber (“optical fiber patents”). SNET maintains that it possesses a valid sublicense for the patents in question, asserts affirmative defenses of estoppel and acquiescence, and counter claims for interference with business relationships and unfair competition. 1
Having heard the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Two Guys v. S.F.R. Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Laba v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- M. O'Neil Supply Co. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bucki v. Singleton (In Re Cardon Realty Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- International Telecommunications Exchange Corp. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1995
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. LTV Corp. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Rodgard Corp. v. Miner Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1995
- Burger King Corp. v. Horn & Hardart Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.