Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Romero v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 30, 2000Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sullivan, J.,

dissents in part and concurs in part and votes to affirm the order, with the following memorandum, in which Luciano, J., concurs. Since I do not believe that the Trial Judge either abused or improvidently exercised his discretion in ordering the plaintiff to submit to an additional physical examination of her ankle, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority’s decision.

*601This is an action to recover damages for physical injuries. On April 16, 1992, the plaintiff fell from the bleachers of a school gymnasium because of a protruding piece of metal. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited10 opinions

Kavanagh v. Ogden Allied Maintenance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
Young v. KalowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
Huggins v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
Romero v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.