Legal Opinion

Christine Wiley, et al. v. Universal Music Investments, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 14, 2026No. 5:25-cv-03095Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHRISTINE WILEY, et al., Case No. 25-cv-03095-PCP 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART 10 UNIVERSAL MUSIC INVESTMENTS, Re: Dkt. Nos. 48, 49, 54 INC., 11 Defendant. 12 13 Defendant Universal Music Investments, Inc. (UMI) moves to dismiss Christine Wiley and 14 Vishal Shah’s amended complaint alleging that UMI violated their privacy rights by placing 15 certain cookies on their devices even though they had expressly opted out of receiving such 16 cookies. For the reasons stated below,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API