Legal Opinion
Ex parte Vilarino
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 4, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
These two eases were submitted together, and though the details are slightly different, *913the charge against both relators, who coneed-edly are aliens, and the grounds of their deportation, are the same. In each proceeding the aliens, Vilarino and Rade, were separately charged in the immigration warrants with residing in tho United States in violation of the Immigration Act of October 16, 1918, as amended by Act June 5, 1920 (8 USCA § 137), in that both are members of the Communist Party — a society or group of persons who believe in, advise, and teach, the overthrow of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Vajtauer v. Commissioner of ImmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gambino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Ungar v. SeamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- In re KosopudDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1920
- Chan Wong v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vilarino v. GarrityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- United States ex rel. Ferraro v. KarnuthDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932
- United States ex rel. Avarello v. KarnuthDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1933
- United States v. Lee HeeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1931