Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 2022No. 124134Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 124,134 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. HARVEY L. ROSS JR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. K.S.A. 22-3201 cannot be used as a procedural vehicle to bring a cause of action; instead, the statute merely sets out the requirements for a charging document. 2. Defective complaint claims are not properly raised in a motion to correct an illegal sentence under K.S.A. 22-3504. Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; TYLER J. ROUSH, judge. Opinion filed June 10, 2022. Affirmed. Sam S. Kepfield, of Sam Kepfield Law Offices, of Hutchinson, was on the brief…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. TrotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. State v. NashSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. State v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. Deal v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API