Legal Opinion

Al Hirschfeld Foundation v. Margo Feiden Galleries

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 8, 2019No. 1:16-cv-04135Unknown

1Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES STRICT COUR mnie □□ DATE FILED:_5] 8 \ □□ AL HIRSCHFELD FOUNDATION, —— Plaintiff, 16 Civ. 4135 (PAE) ~ OPINION & ORDER THE MARGO FEIDEN GALLERIES LTD. and MARGO FEIDEN, Defendants. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: This litigation arises from a contract between the renowned cartoonist Al Hirschfeld and the gallery licensed to represent him for much of his career. Plaintiff is the Al Hirschfeld Foundation (the “Foundation”), which succeeded to Hirschfeld’s interests and obligations upon his death in 2003. Defendants are Margo Feiden and the Margo Feiden…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hicks v. BainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Wright v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Holcomb v. Iona CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API