Legal Opinion

Watrous v. Conor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934No. Docket No. 149, Calendar No. 37,658PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

These cases were consolidated by stipulation providing for separate verdicts. Trial by jury was waived. The facts are rather sparse, but such testimony as we have is practically undisputed. Defendant Arthur C. Conor, driving his father’s car, struck both plaintiffs, sisters aged 68 and 65 years, respectively, as they were crossing Washington boulevard at Grand River avenue in the city of Detroit. They had just alighted from a street car at the southwest corner and were walking towards the east to attend church about 7 o ’clock on the morning of January 1, 1932. Plaintiffs’ testimony shows…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Weil v. LongyearMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Cawood v. Earl Paige & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Michaels v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Petersen v. LundinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Sebring v. MawbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Palenkas v. Beaumont HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Brewster v. Martin Marietta Aluminum Sales, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Moore v. SpanglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API