Legal Opinion

Commercial National Bank v. Brill

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1893No. 4984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the district court of'Cuming county. Tried below before Norris, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

The plaintiff in error brought tbis action in the district court of Cuming county to recover from the defendants in error upon a promissory note for $315, made to the order *627of the J. H. Mahler Company, and by that company indorsed to plaintiff. The defendants admitted the execution of the note but alleged that it had been procured from them by the Mahler Company by fraud and without consideration, and that one Miller, the secretary of the Mahler Company, had, without authority from that company, delivered the note to the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff knew that Miller had no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lester v. WebbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1861

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clancy v. BarkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Armstrong v. StearnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. McClatchey v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Lihs v. LihsNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Piper v. NeylonNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API