Legal Opinion
Prame v. Ferrell
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1909No. 1,836PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, District Judge.
From the opinion of Judge Tayler, who heard the case in the Circuit Court, we quote the following as a sufficient statement of the facts:
“Prior to February 1, 1899, the complainant, Ferrell, and the defendant, Frame, were partners under the firm name of A. T. Ferrell & Co., engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling machines known as ‘cleaners’ or ‘separators,’ for cleaning seeds, grains, and other products of the farm *703and garden, at Saginaw, in the state of Michigan. The firm had built up a business extending practically throughout the country. While sales…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Gibbs v. Consolidated Gas Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hubbard v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Moore & Handley Hardware Co. v. Towers Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Harrison v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Plunkett Chemical Co. v. ReeveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Schnucks Twenty-Five, Inc. v. BettendorfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Parker v. the Lewis Grocery Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Thomas W. Briggs Co. v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Hall Mfg. Co. v. Western Steel & Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.