Legal Opinion

CHANEY v. ESKRIDGE CHEVROLET

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 2015No. 112,810PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LARRY JOPLIN, Judge.

¶ 1 Defendant/Appellant, Eskridge Chevrolet, seeks review of the trial court's order denying Eskridge's motion to compel arbitration on the contract and tort claims of Plain tiffs, Danny and Candy Chaney, arising out of the automobile contract for a 2012 Chevrolet Colorado truck, purchased by the Cha-neys in June 2012. Eskridge argues the purchase agreement, signed by Danny Chaney, specifically compels the parties' dispute be resolved by arbitration, contrary to the trial court's order which found the arbitration clause to be invalid. In the alternative, Eskridge argues…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Oklahoma Oncology & Hematology P.C. v. US Oncology, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Silk v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Bruner v. Timberlane Manor Limited PartnershipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Feightner v. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. CHANEY v. ESKRIDGE CHEVROLETCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API