Bishop v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOLLERS, Judge.
Appellant was charged by indictment with the offense of delivery of a controlled substance. Upon motion of the State the prosecution was reduced to the lesser included offense of possession of a controlled substance. Upon a plea of guilty before the court the appellant was found guilty and his punishment was assessed at confinement for a period of six years and a fine of $1,000.
In his only ground of error the appellant contends that the indictment was fundamentally defective in that it failed to allege an offense because the Texas Controlled Substances Act does not…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Coleman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. HermerdingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- Crowl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Crowl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.