Haag v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Christopher Haag appealed from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief from criminal convictions entered after he pled guilty to drug-related charges involving JWH-018 l-Pentyl-3 (1-naphthoyl) indole (“JWH-018”). We affirm, concluding JWH-018 was a prohibited controlled substance when Haag committed the acts alleged in the criminal complaint in November 2010.
I
[¶2] Haag was charged with possession of a controlled substance, JWH-018, with intent to deliver to another and with possession of drug paraphernalia for using a controlled substance,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lynnes v. LynnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Vandeberg v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Syvertson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- DELVO v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Henke v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Myers v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Dominguez v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Lehman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Wacht v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Chisholm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.