Legal Opinion

Haag v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2012No. 20120196PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Christopher Haag appealed from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief from criminal convictions entered after he pled guilty to drug-related charges involving JWH-018 l-Pentyl-3 (1-naphthoyl) indole (“JWH-018”). We affirm, concluding JWH-018 was a prohibited controlled substance when Haag committed the acts alleged in the criminal complaint in November 2010.

I

[¶2] Haag was charged with possession of a controlled substance, JWH-018, with intent to deliver to another and with possession of drug paraphernalia for using a controlled substance,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lynnes v. LynnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Vandeberg v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Syvertson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. DELVO v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Henke v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Myers v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Dominguez v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Lehman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Wacht v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Chisholm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API