Legal Opinion

Wacht v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2015No. 20140418PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Daniel Evan Wacht appealed from a district court order summarily dismissing his application for postconviction relief. We conclude the court did not err in summarily dismissing Wacht’s claims for ineffective assistance of counsel and for relief based on newly discovered evidence. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Wacht was convicted by a jury in 2012 of the murder of Kurt Johnson. He was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. His conviction was affirmed in State v. Wacht, 2013 ND 126, 833 N.W.2d 455.

[¶ 3] Wacht applied for postconviction relief…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SteinbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Clark v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Syvertson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Heyen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Myers v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Chatman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Everett v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Pinkney v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Wootan v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API