Wacht v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Daniel Evan Wacht appealed from a district court order summarily dismissing his application for postconviction relief. We conclude the court did not err in summarily dismissing Wacht’s claims for ineffective assistance of counsel and for relief based on newly discovered evidence. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Wacht was convicted by a jury in 2012 of the murder of Kurt Johnson. He was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. His conviction was affirmed in State v. Wacht, 2013 ND 126, 833 N.W.2d 455.
[¶ 3] Wacht applied for postconviction relief…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. SteinbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Clark v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Syvertson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Heyen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Myers v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Chatman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Everett v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Pinkney v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Wootan v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.